Using the panel
discussions of the most recent World Science Fiction Convention in Spokane, August
2015, I will jump off, jump on, rail against, and shamelessly agree with the
BRIEF DESCRIPTION given in the pdf copy of the Program Guide. This is event #2153.
The link is provided below…
Future Pharma – How
will biotechnology and genome research revolutionize pharmaceuticals? How can
biotech be better integrated into fiction? This panel will help provide an
understanding of the diversity of contemporary and theoretical pharmaceuticals
and how biotechnological breakthroughs can help move a plot along. Heather Rose
Jones (m), Peter Charron, Barry Gold
My first ever “published” science fiction story dealt with
just this subject, back when I was a 9th grader in 1971. I remember
my incredible success with this story because a girl in my Journalism class got
really excited as I described my story, about a man-on-the-run from the
Galactic Drug Corporation. As I read, the character commented that the company provided
the purest form of any drug you could want.
She looked up at me and said, “Where are they?”
As I recall, I just gave her a blank look...as a ninth
grader I was about as “uncool” as you could possibly be: plaid, high-water
slacks, bowl cut hair, hated blue jeans and pizza, read all the time...I had no
idea what I was writing about, but I had somehow picked up on the prevailing
culture enough to write the piece.
Since then, everyone I know has benefitted from
biopharmacology: my wife takes human insulin produced by bacteria; my brother
and father have stents in their hearts that had been coated with a substance
that prevented the rejection of the foreign object; my brother-in-law who was
born a hemophiliac, took freeze-dried Factor XIII in order to increase the
clotting ability of his blood; I could go on, but there’s no reason to. The
science fictional possibilities of pharmacology, biology, and biotech is
undeniable.
I have a world where I’m exploring the possibilities right
now. In my future, there are no aliens. There are also very few habitable
planets (ever read the book, HABITABLE PLANETS FOR MAN? If you haven’t, here
you go: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/commercial_books/2007/RAND_CB179-1.pdf
This book not only inspired me, it lit a fire under me that hasn’t ever gone
out. I LOVE alien worlds, aliens, and everything else about SF!)
In my future, Humans are modified to fit environments and
Humanity has split into two factions – the Empire of Man and the Confluence of
Humanity. The Empire refuses to admit that anyone who is less than 65% Original
Human DNA is Human. The Confluence embraces the modification of the Human
genome to whatever lengths it takes to serve the rest of Humanity.
Obviously there will be conflict, and my focal point is in
the clouds of the super-Jovian, puffy-Jupiter, named River. I’ve had two
stories published in this world, “The Baptism of Johnny Ferocious”, “The Prince
of Blood and Spit”, plus the as-yet-unscheduled, “Into The Deaths”. I imagine I’ll
collect them altogether someday.
But back to the point of this essay, we will continue to
expand our use of “manufactured” biotech products and will continually be faced
with the problem of limits. At what point do we draw back?
Case to point is the refusal by parents of technology that
would allow a deaf child to hear. The argument is that “deafness is not a
handicap or a disease”. Deaf Australia puts it this way: “...a [cochlear] implant
‘implies that deaf people are ill or incomplete individuals, are lonely and
unhappy, cannot communicate effectively with others and are all desperately
searching for a cure for their condition. [This] demeans deaf people, belittles
their culture and language and makes no acknowledgment of the diversity of
lives deaf people lead, or their many achievements.’”
If this is already an issue, what does the future hold?
Resource: http://nad.org/