November 3, 2013

POSSIBLY IRRITATING ESSAYS: Does Ray Bradbury Have Anything To Say To Us Today?

No, not really.

A product of the intersection of an idyllic, Midwestern, small-town life for his first six years, he then bounced back and forth between that same town and a desert southwest life until he finally washed up on the shore of a different American backdrop: La La Land.

Enamored by “movie stars” that he actually saw and spoke to, he became a writer through a contest – where his winning story was pulled from the slush pile by Truman Capote. He met people, wrote for people, and grew up with his feet firmly planted in his birth world whilst he lived in a world so different from the one we live in today that there is no connection between “us” and “him”.

The differences between mid-20th Century and the second decade of the 21st Century are so great that THIS future is completely divorced from the futures he wrote as a young man.

Besides, he never saw HIMSELF as a science fiction author which many in the SF community claimed he was. In his own words: “First of all, I don't write science fiction. I've only done one science fiction book and that's Fahrenheit 451, based on reality. It was named so to represent the temperature at which paper ignites. Science fiction is a depiction of the real. Fantasy is a depiction of the unreal. So Martian Chronicles is not science fiction, it's fantasy. It couldn't happen, you see? That's the reason it's going to be around a long time — because it's a Greek myth, and myths have staying power.” While at the same time trumpeting his long-lasting he eliminates himself as an influential SF writer.

He has been feted by the speculative fiction community (which encompasses SF, F, H as well as weird fiction, supernatural fiction, superhero fiction, utopian and dystopian fiction, apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction, and alternate history) as “one of our own”, receiving the SFWA Grand Master Award, his body of work hardly supports this contention. More like – he humored a fan base who really only focused on his speculative fiction rather than the entire body of his work which included plays, poetry collections, scripts, and children’s books.

While he has also been proclaimed as the first writer to propose “the idea of banking ATMs and earbuds and Bluetooth headsets…and the concepts of artificial intelligence” – these two “inventions” rose from two works – the one book he claimed was SF and a short story, “I Sing The Body Electric”.

Even so, Bradbury’s intent never seemed to be to explore the interaction of science and humanity but rather look at the human condition. In this he has far more connection to the world of “literary fiction” than of any sort of genre fiction. In fact, he has been honored by the two most recent presidents of the United States – neither of which (I feel confident in guessing) has ever read either him or any other speculative fiction author – and who were most likely directed to do the act on the grounds that their PR people were more interested in tying their political bosses to a Famous Person Who Does Stuff With Words And Is Somehow Vaguely Connected With The Future – than in any way, shape, or form of “recognizing his literary greatness”.

I’m just sayin’.

Anyway, as for saying anything important to the current crop of speculative fiction writers – I would venture that he has not a coherent thing to say to us. I base my conclusion on the following:

1)      Most people are born in, grew up in, and live in urban areas.

2)     Most people who write could never in their wildest dreams imagine roller skating ANYWHERE in an urban area and seeing movie stars.

3)     Bradbury went so far as to “stat[e] in 2010, ‘We have too many cellphones. We've got too many internets. We have got to get rid of those machines. We have too many machines now.’”

4)     He remained married to one person for some 46 years.

5)     He appeared in several media adaptations of his writing.

6)     If I were to write THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES today, I would be unable to find a publisher. The SENSIBILITY of the stories is firmly based on the monoculture of white male supremacy of the mid-20th Century. That culture neither exists today nor will it ever return.

7)     Information today is both instantaneous and easily corruptible, it was not in the middle of the 20th Century.

Therefore, while I will read Bradbury for entertainment, I will not be looking to him as an influence for my writing.


No comments: